Cuadro 5: MATRIZ INTEGRADORA DE INFORMACIÓN PARA ESTIMAR
EL NIVEL DE USO DE TECNOLOGÍA E IMPACTO AMBIENTAL POR MUNICIPIO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REGIÓN COPLADE |
NUMERO MPIO.
(INEGI) |
MUNICIPIO |
ÍNDICE DE HUMEDAD AL 70% DE PROBABILIDAD |
PENDIENTES |
SUPERFICIE SEGÚN REGIMEN DE AGRICULTURA |
NIVEL DE USO DE TECNOLOGÍA |
REGIÓN HIDROLÓGICA A LA QUE PERTENECE EL MPIO. |
CONSIDERACIÓN PRELIMINAR DEL NIVEL DE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL |
|
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
TEMP. |
HUM. |
RIEGO |
BAJO |
MEDIO |
ALTO |
NO. DE CUENCA |
%
EN LA CUENCA |
|
BAJO,
MEDIO, ALTO |
11 |
5 |
AMATITAN |
0 |
0 |
100 |
50 |
15 |
35 |
45 |
0 |
5 |
90 |
10 |
0 |
8 |
5 |
95 |
5 |
|
11 |
7 |
ANTONIO ESCOBEDO |
0 |
0 |
100 |
65 |
25 |
10 |
20 |
18 |
9 |
42.5 |
38.3 |
19.1 |
8 |
1 |
90 |
10 |
|
6 |
14 |
ATOYAC |
5 |
40 |
55 |
30 |
50 |
20 |
15 |
0 |
15 |
50 |
50 |
0 |
8 |
2 |
98 |
2 |
|
4 |
18 |
LA BARCA |
0 |
0 |
100 |
95 |
2 |
3 |
45 |
3 |
40 |
30 |
51.1 |
18.9 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
12 |
29 |
CUQUIO |
0 |
35 |
65 |
65 |
25 |
10 |
50 |
0 |
2 |
56.1 |
40 |
3.9 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
4 |
30 |
CHAPALA |
0 |
0 |
100 |
50 |
10 |
40 |
70 |
0 |
0 |
80 |
20 |
0 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
4 |
33 |
DEGOLLADO |
0 |
75 |
25 |
60 |
35 |
5 |
30 |
0 |
8 |
78.9 |
21.1 |
0 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
2 |
35 |
ENCARNACION DE DIAZ |
55 |
45 |
0 |
88 |
10 |
2 |
18 |
0 |
15 |
55 |
45 |
0 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
BAJO |
4 |
42 |
JAMAY |
0 |
0 |
100 |
85 |
7 |
8 |
30 |
0 |
45 |
40 |
30 |
30 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
3 |
48 |
JESUS MARIA |
0 |
20 |
80 |
48 |
46 |
6 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
50 |
0 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
4 |
50 |
JOCOTEPEC |
0 |
65 |
35 |
20 |
10 |
60 |
60 |
0 |
7 |
50 |
39.5 |
10.5 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
4 |
63 |
OCOTLAN |
0 |
0 |
100 |
80 |
15 |
5 |
30 |
0 |
40 |
42.8 |
20 |
37.2 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
4 |
66 |
PONCITLAN |
0 |
30 |
70 |
60 |
15 |
25 |
15 |
0 |
15 |
50 |
30 |
20 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
6 |
82 |
SAYULA |
0 |
90 |
10 |
30 |
35 |
25 |
8 |
0 |
32 |
20 |
0 |
80 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
2 |
91 |
TEOCALTICHE |
0 |
100 |
0 |
90 |
9 |
1 |
60 |
0 |
8 |
85 |
15 |
0 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
BAJO, MEDIO |
3 |
93 |
TEPATITLAN DE
MORELOS |
0 |
2 |
98 |
85 |
10 |
5 |
35 |
0 |
6 |
85.4 |
14.6 |
0 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
11 |
94 |
TEQUILA |
0 |
10 |
90 |
15 |
20 |
65 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
90 |
10 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
95 |
5 |
|
4 |
96 |
TIZAPAN EL ALTO |
0 |
5 |
95 |
35 |
35 |
30 |
15 |
0 |
15 |
50 |
35 |
15 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
12 |
97 |
TLAJOMULCO DE
ZUÑIGA |
0 |
5 |
95 |
65 |
15 |
20 |
60 |
10 |
2 |
60 |
25 |
15 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
4 |
105 |
TOTOTLAN |
0 |
0 |
100 |
70 |
20 |
10 |
20 |
3 |
30 |
37.7 |
30.6 |
31.7 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
2 |
109 |
UNION DE SAN
ANTONIO |
0 |
100 |
0 |
90 |
10 |
0 |
65 |
0 |
5 |
80 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
BAJO, MEDIO |
2 |
116 |
VILLA HIDALGO |
0 |
100 |
0 |
75 |
20 |
5 |
20 |
0 |
5 |
80 |
20 |
0 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
BAJO |
3 |
118 |
YAHUALICA DE
GLZ. GALLO |
0 |
99 |
1 |
60 |
35 |
5 |
30 |
0 |
5 |
80 |
15 |
5 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
6 |
119 |
ZACOALCO DE
TORRES |
95 |
0 |
5 |
60 |
30 |
10 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
80 |
20 |
0 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
4 |
123 |
ZAPOTLAN |
0 |
0 |
100 |
65 |
25 |
10 |
25 |
0 |
25 |
50 |
40 |
10 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
12 |
124 |
ZAPOTLANEJO |
0 |
0 |
100 |
70 |
25 |
5 |
50 |
0 |
1 |
85 |
13 |
2 |
8 |
|
100 |
|
|
8 |
15 |
AUTLAN DE NAVARRO |
10 |
25 |
65 |
20 |
10 |
70 |
20 |
0 |
15 |
57.2 |
20 |
22.8 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
98 |
|
6 |
99 |
TOLIMAN |
0 |
45 |
55 |
15 |
35 |
50 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
90 |
10 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
10 |
90 |
|
5 |
49 |
JILOTLAN DE LOS
DOLORES |
0 |
85 |
15 |
50 |
30 |
20 |
18 |
0 |
17 |
65 |
30 |
5 |
3 |
|
100 |
|
|
7 |
88 |
TECOLOTLAN |
0 |
2 |
98 |
25 |
42 |
33 |
19.7 |
0 |
0.25 |
90 |
10 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
99 |
1 |
|
6 |
108 |
TUXPAN |
0 |
20 |
80 |
25 |
50 |
25 |
40 |
0 |
5 |
80 |
8.9 |
11.1 |
2 |
|
100 |
|
|
7 |
110 |
UNION DE TULA |
0 |
0 |
100 |
55 |
30 |
15 |
31.4 |
2 |
4.4 |
35 |
50 |
15 |
2 |
|
100 |
|
MEDIO |
6 |
121 |
ZAPOTILTIC |
0 |
30 |
70 |
70 |
20 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
40 |
15 |
20 |
65 |
2 |
|
100 |
|
|
6 |
122 |
ZAPOTITLAN DE
VADILLO |
0 |
20 |
80 |
10 |
65 |
25 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
100 |
|
|
6 |
133 |
SAN GABRIEL |
0 |
10 |
90 |
25 |
50 |
25 |
25 |
0 |
8 |
75.7 |
24.3 |
0 |
2 |
|
100 |
|
|
11 |
6 |
AMECA |
0 |
0 |
100 |
45 |
30 |
35 |
40 |
1 |
25 |
60.6 |
1.6 |
37.8 |
1 |
2 |
90 |
10 |
|
7 |
11 |
ATENGO |
0 |
0 |
100 |
40 |
10 |
40 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
95 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
98 |
|
11 |
36 |
ETZATLAN |
0 |
0 |
100 |
15 |
20 |
65 |
15 |
0 |
5 |
50 |
25 |
25 |
1 |
8 |
70 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INDICE DE
HUMEDAD AL 70% DE PROBABILIDAD |
|
|
|
PENDIENTES: |
|
|
CUENCAS
: Región Hidrológica (RH) |
|
|
|
|
1.- |
Deficiente y excesiva en extremo |
|
|
|
1.- |
Menor al 5 % |
|
1.-
|
Ameca |
|
|
|
5.- |
Costa de Michoacán |
2.- |
Moderadamente eficiente y excesiva |
|
|
|
2.- |
Del 5 al 15 % |
|
2.-
|
Armeria-Coahuayan |
|
|
6.- |
El Salado |
3.- |
Adecuada y ligeramente excesiva |
|
|
|
3.- |
Mayor al 15 % |
|
3.- |
Balsas |
|
|
|
7.- |
Huicicila |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.- |
Costa de Jalisco |
|
|
8.- |
Lerma-Santiago |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|